Dawn Estep — Sued For Stock Fraud

Virginia "Dawn" Estep aka Dawn Stroud — San Antonio, TX & Torrance, CA

Dawn Estep — Sued For Stock Fraud header image 1

Dawn Estep – Sued for Stock Fraud

April 2nd, 2012 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

DAWN ESTEP aka Virginia Dawn Estep aka Dawn Stroud purported Technology advisor and executive at Murdoch Group —  from San Antonio, Texas and now living in Torrance, California — Sued for FRAUD in Los Angeles Superior Court.

Click for Dawn Estep Images

Or click on links below for:

Dawn Estep Arrests & Incarceration

Dawn Estep on Linkedin

Dawn Estep on Google+

Dawn Estep on Facebook

Dawn Estep got a degree from Texas A&M?

Comments OffTags:··························

Def. Estep Sells Plaintiff VMWare Stock

February 13th, 2010 · No Comments · Dawn Estep

Defendant Estep claimed to Plaintiff in early 2007 that she/her company, Murdoch Group Inc., was the IPO consultant for VMWare, a subsidiary of EMC.

Estep claimed she had solidified multi-million dollar investment deals with Symantec’s Peter Norton, and Google Inc., on behalf of Plaintiff’s company. Under the guise of this “larger” deal, Estep then “sold” her shares — granted to her as the VMW ipo consultant — of pre-ipo stock to the Plaintiff. Estep claimed these shares were available through a program called, “Friends & Family.”

Plaintiff, upon Estep’s specific request, issued (3) separate interstate wire-transfers in Aug., 2007, to Dawn Estep, for shares of vmw, 2 days prior to VMWare’s IPO.

Estep claimed she would procure the stock certificates after VMWare (VMW) went public, then issue the “certs” to the Plaintiff.  As of 2012, Dawn Estep has never come forward with, nor issued any  stock certificates to the Plaintiff.

Dawn Estep was sued for Stock Fraud in Los Angeles Superior Court in 2008. Plaintiff now has a $1.7 million dollar fraud judgment against Dawn Estep in this civil matter.

Listen to Defendant Dawn Estep’s voicemail discussing VMWare stock for Plaintiff

→ No CommentsTags:·····

Dawn Estep – Arrested Sept. 15th, 2008

August 3rd, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Excerpted from “Opposition to Motion”  (click to read the motion)

“When I first discovered that Ms. Estep was a habitual liar, as set forth in my Complaint, I confronted her. “Estep” made various threats to me and to my (now former) assistant of bodily harm. Many of these threats were sent as e-mails or left as voice messages on my voice mail. I have set forth many of the threats in my Complaint.

Ms. Estep currently has criminal charges pending against her in the State of Texas, specifically in Austin, Texas, concerning check fraud. She was arrested on or about September 15, 2008. Also, since late last year, I have discovered other individuals who also have been defrauded by Ms. Estep. To that end, I am aware of additional suits that will be filed against her, her company and her corporation shortly.

Listen below to Estep’s Voicemail (part of legal discovery) discussing her “unfortunate” incarceration.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Comments OffTags:···

Dawn Estep Arrested, March 9, 2010

February 12th, 2011 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Dawn Estep involved in a DWI in Bexar County, San Antonio, Texas. Estep, driving a white Toyota Avalon owned by her father, Dwight, carried an open container of alcohol in her purse when the accident occurred. Estep ran a stop sign, colliding with a Chevy Suburban driven by an employee of Jefferson Bank.

Estep claimed she could not attend her CA deposition date due to injuries sustained in said accident. FACT: Plaintiff’s attorney spoke with Estep’s San Antonio Doctor who indicated her injuries were… very minor. Dawn Estep

Why was Estep driving her father’s car/living with her father in Marion, Texas? Seems there was was a Temporary Restraining Order (see below) filed by her husband with a demand she find alternate living arrangement (exit 906 Cambridge Oval)  and to keep Estep from driving a 2005 Mercedes M500 that Estep claims belonged to her.

Below, Dawn Estep claims in an email to the Plaintiff that she owns and drives a 2008 Porsche Cayenne; SEE photo attached.

Dawn Estep’s Blood Alcohol level at time of her DWI: 1.54

Texas Legal Limit:  up to .08%

Dawn Estep Jail Sentence – 1 year.  Probation: 1 year   Drivers License Suspended: 1 year  Fine: $60,000

Arrest – 9/15/2008  — Felony

More lies…

Dawn, where's your Porsche?


Dawn Estep in her Porsche Cayenne

Dawn Estep in her Porsche Cayenne

Dawn Estep Incident Report - March 2010


Comments OffTags:·······

Criminal Reports Filed

December 1st, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

–> Santa Monica Police Department
–> San Antonio Police Department
–> State & Fed. InvestigationsClick Here

Comments OffTags:····

Restraining Order against Dawn Estep

January 29th, 2011 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

dawn estep is a crook!

dawn estep guilty of securities fraud

Darren Wayne Stroud

Comments OffTags:·····

Estep, IPO consultant for VMware Inc.?

December 1st, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

The following is excerpted from Plaintiff’s Lawsuit:

On or about July 2007, Defendant Estep represented to Plaintiff that VMWare was intending to provide to her certain restricted shares of stock in consideration for the services she provided. Defendant Estep further represented that she was willing to sell a portion of those shares to Plaintiff for the sum of $*********.

In further discussions, Defendant Estep represented that if Plaintiff provided to her the sum of $********, she would obtain ***** shares from VMWare and that said shares would be placed in Plaintiff’s name under his social security number.

During initial requests, Defendant Estep represented that she had obtained the share certificates and that she was holding certificates in Plaintiff’s name in her safe deposit box. In late February 2008, Defendant Estep told Plaintiff that she intended to send him the share certificates by Federal Express.

But having not received any shares and after inquiring further, on or about March 5, 2008, Estep stated the following:  “I still have the shares locked away in a safety deposit box.  We all know I’m a lazy ass. Since I’ve gotten two kids, I’m so freakin lazy.”

On or about May 26, 2008, Estep stated: “It’s Dawn Estep, the stock is in your name, it’s been in your name since day one, it’s been in your social, and it’s just I’ve had it with my transfer agent.  Not my transfer agent, the transfer to me. It has been in the safety deposit box with my stuff.”

Comments OffTags:

$1.7 Million Fraud Judgment

May 7th, 2011 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

$1.7 Million Fraud Judgment

(click here to see conformed copy)

Dawn Estep. Sued

Dawn Estep – Linkedin

Comments OffTags:·····················

Google Inc. and tech-titan, Peter Norton invest millions???

December 1st, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Did two of Tech’s top names — Google Inc., and tech titan Peter Norton — invest $18 million dollars in a small, L.A. based internet apparel firm?

According to Def. Dawn Estep, of Murdoch Group Inc, Google Inc. entered into an agreement, solicited by Estep on Plaintiff’s behalf, and  allegedly executed by a prominent San Francisco law firm, Pillsbury Winthrop, to invest $15 million dollars, while “Norton” purportedly faxed Estep, on Plaintiff’s behalf, an offer for $3 million in first round funding.

Dawn Estep, in voicemail and email, claims to have had several meetings with Google on behalf of Plaintiff. Estep then names several of her contacts at Google to include, Leslie Miley, and several others.

Ironically, AMAZINGLY, despite over  400  voicemail, 4,000-plus emails and hundreds of SMS text messages related to business deals from Estep, along with witness declarations (under oath), AND, multiple interstate wire transfers with Estep as the PAYEE — confirmed by Police subpoena’s — Estep, after being sued, then claims NO SUCH BUSINESS DEALS EXISTED, even in the face of her repeated insistence, prior to being sued,  (via voicemails/emails/sms)  that these deals DID, exist.

The kicker?  Estep’s voicemail stating, “no one has ever accused ME of falsifying a business deal.”  Wow! Wrap your head around that one!  LISTEN!

***Voicemail and documents submitted to the court

Read the full Complaint

Comments OffTags:·······

Abstract of Judgment

April 26th, 2011 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

906 Cambridge Oval Deed

Dawn Estep — Abstract of Judgment Filed in Los Angeles and Orange County, Ca


Comments OffTags:·····

906 Cambridge Oval

December 5th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

This home for sale is owned by Defendant Dawn Estep, Alamo Heights, SA, TX: In the Public Domain!

See Abstract of Judgment against Dawn Estep

See 1.7 Million Dollar Judgment against Dawn Estep

See Rip-off Report on Dawn Estep


And be sure to: Take a Video Tour of Dawn Estep’s Home for Sale!


906 Cambridge Oval San Antonio Texas

Dawn Estep

dawn estep

Comments OffTags:·········

Default Judgment Entered

March 21st, 2011 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

03/14/2011 Default Judgment ( (SIGNED BY JUDGE LISA HART COLE) ) - Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/14/2011 Request for Judicial Notice – Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/14/2011 Declaration (OF JAVIER C. RIVERA, IN SUPP OF PLTF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AGAINST DAWN ESTEP AKA DAWN STROUD, MURDOCH GROUP, LLC AND MURDOCH GROUP, INC. ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/14/2011 Declaration (OF XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX IN SUPP OF PLTF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AGAINST DAWN ESTEP AKA DAWN STROUD, MURDOCH GROUP, LLC AND MURDOCH GROUP, INC. ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/14/2011 Request to Enter Judgment - Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

Dawn Estep

Comments OffTags:·

“I Heart Beer” Belt Buckle

April 4th, 2011 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Hey Dawn – that “I Heart Beer” belt buckle? It’s a Fake! $29 to reproduce from a photo and an extra 10 bucks for the logo engraving! Best part? The “Foreign” WRAPPING PAPER was formerly the bottom of a desperately-in-need-of-cleaning, bird cage! Yep. True story!

Like wearer, like buckle!


Dawn Estep

dawn estep sued for fraud

Comments OffTags:··

UPDATE: Voicemail and Documents

December 3rd, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Listen to 10 (ten) additional Voicemail as part of Discovery, along with new Court documents, witness declarations and more the week of Sept. 28th.

Comments OffTags:

Civil Default Prove Up ((NOTICE WAIVED))

December 31st, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Dawn Estep

Civil Default Prove Up Hearing01/14/2011 at 09:00 a.m. in department WER at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, Ca

dawn estep stroud

dawn  estep

dawn estep


Comments OffTags:

Dawn Estep Voicemail Updates

December 2nd, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Updated Voicemail — Listen (click)

Over 40 voicemail from Dawn Estep are now part of legal discovery/declarations and are in the public domain. Listen!

Comments OffTags:···

A Default Judgment Has Been Entered

December 26th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Dawn Estep has Defaulted

Dawn Estep did not appear on April 26th, 2010 in Los Angeles Superior Court  — her testimony has been struck and a default judgement has been entered against: Murdoch Group Inc, Murdoch Grp. LLC and her person, Dawn Estep.

**Trial Date Vacated
04/26/2010 at 09:30 am in Department WER, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding - Jury Trial (-FINAL STATUS CONF)

dawn estep scam

check fraud dawn estep

Comments OffTags:

Update: Motion to Strike Testimony

April 23rd, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Final Conference Hearing

A final conference hearing is scheduled for April 26th. If Def. Estep does not appear, her testimony will be struck, a default judgment will be entered and a prove up hearing will be held.

Note: April 23rd, Def. Virginia “Dawn” Estep did NOT appear on motions to compel + $6k in sanctions. Sanctions and Motions were granted in full.


Comments OffTags:

Estep’s Attorney Want’s Out!

April 9th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Def. Dawn Estep’s Attorney requests to be recused from the case – Estep did not pay her BILL and is apparently and repeatedly  non-responsive to lawyer requests for information.

Ironically, Miss Estep (Mr. Estep recently filed for divorce), had discussed with the Plaintiff on myriad occasions her disdain for lawyers,  and that  ”she knows more about the law than any attorney she has ever hired” — and according to her, people are always trying to sue her (imagine that), so she has the “best” legal representation. Estep concluded saying, “she prefers to hire less expensive firms, insists that she in not a sympathetic witness/plaintiff, and  further insists she maintains the venerable law firm Pillsbury Winthrop as her main legal team.

Comments OffTags:

Estep in an Auto Accident?

February 14th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Can’t attend her Deposition?

Estep claims to have been in an auto accident and cannot attend her deposition due to injuries sustained in the alleged accident. However, Plaintiff’s attorney spoke with Estep’s doctor fortwith; according to said Dr., “she’s just fine.”

Defendant Dawn Estep’s scheduled depositions:

1. December, 2009

2. February 2nd, 2010

3. February 23rd, 2010. **Final scheduled deposition date

Dawn Estep failed to appear on February 23rd, 2010

Comments OffTags:

Update: March 29, 2010

March 25th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Motions Granted + $6k in Sanctions

03/25/2010 at 09:00 am in Department WER, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding Motion – Compel Further Responses (PLFF – TO FORM INTERROGS/SANCS-MTN TO DEEM REQ. ADMITTED/SANCS-MTN TO COMPEL DEPO-M/CMPL RSP TO RFP (M/CMPL RSP TORFP,FURTH RSP TO FM INRGS,M/DEEMRFA ADM GTD.

Motions to be Heard:

03/25/2010 at 09:01 am in department WER at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401 Motion to Compel (RSPS TO REQS FOR PROD (PLTF)-M/CMPL FURTH RSPS TO FM INTRGS(P)-M/TO DEEM RFA ADMITTED (PLTF)-M/CMPL DEFT ESTEP TO ATTD DEPO(P))

03/08/2010 Ex-Parte Application (FOR ORDERS SHRTNING TIME FOR HRGS ON FOLLOWING:1.MO TO CMPL RSPS TO RFP;2.MO TO CMPL FURTH RSPS TO FRM INTRGS;3.MO TO CMPL DEF’S DEPO;4. MO TO DEEM RFA ADMITD. FOR ORDER SETG 4-12-10 FOR FURTH DISC MTNS..) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/08/2010 at 08:30 am in Department WER, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding Exparte proceeding – Motion Granted in Part

Comments OffTags:

Motion to Strike Estep’s Testimony — April 23rd

April 19th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Def. Dawn Estep has failed to respond to motions to compel her deposition, form interrogatories and discovery, without objection.

Friday, April 23rd — Los Angeles Superior Court hears Motion to Strike Def. Dawn Estep’s testimony

Monday, April 26th — Prove-up Hearing

Read Motions + $6k in Sanctions

Comments OffTags:

Update: March 7, 2010

March 7th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Motions to Compel + Sanctions

04/22/2010 at 09:00 am in department WER at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401 Motion – Compel Further Responses (PLFF – TO FORM INTERROGS/SANCS-MTN TO DEEM REQ. ADMITTED/SANCS-MTN TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE AT DEPO/ PRODUCTION OF DOCS/SANCS)

03/05/2010 Notice of Motion (and motion to deem requests for admissions admitted and request for monetary sanctions in the sum of $1,840.00 against defendant Dawn Estep; declaration of John x xxxx in support thereof) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/05/2010 Notice of Motion (and motion to compel defendant Dawn Estep to attend her deposition and to produce documents thereon without objection and for sanctions in the sum of $2,101.00; declaration of John x. xxxx….) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/05/2010 Notice of Motion (and motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories and request for monetary sanctions in the sum of $1,840.00 against defendant Dawn Estep; declaration of John xxxx in support…) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/05/2010 Statement – General (Plaintiff’s separate statement in support of motion to compel further responses to form interr- ogatories and request for sanctions against defendant Dawn Estep in the sum of $1,840.00) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

Comments OffTags:

Updates: 03/03/2010

February 13th, 2010 · No Comments · Dawn Estep

Hearing on Motion to Compel Doc’s

04/12/2010 at 09:01 am in department WER at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401 Motion to Compel (RESP TO REQ FOR PRODUC OF DOCS(PLTFF))

Def. Estep Fails to appear

Defendant Dawn Estep has failed to appear for the 3rd scheduled deposition date – February 23, 2010

→ No CommentsTags:

Update: 01/07/2010

February 13th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Estep Loses Motion

Read about itlink


December 3rd, 2009 - Los Angeles Superior court  Judge Denied Dawn Estep’s request to set aside a default against her corporation, Murdoch Group Inc. Read the Plaintiff’s “Opposition” to Defendant Estep’s motion.

Motion to Compel (RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES & REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE SUM OF$1,840.00 AGAINST DFNT DAWN ESTEP & HER ATTYS OF RECORD,RADCLIFF & SAIKI,JOINTLY & SEVERALLY;DECLA OF JOHN x.xxxxx) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

Comments OffTags:

Dawn Estep

October 16th, 2011 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Profile of the Sociopath

This website summarizes some of the common features of descriptions of the behavior of sociopaths.
* Glibness and Superficial Charm

* Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

* Grandiose Sense of Self
Feels entitled to certain things as “their right.”

* Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.

* Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

* Shallow Emotions
When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

* Incapacity for Love

* Need for Stimulation
Living on the edge. Verbal outbursts and physical punishments are normal. Promiscuity and gambling are common.

* Callousness/Lack of Empathy
Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others’ feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

* Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating hopelessness in the victim. Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.

* Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency
Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet “gets by” by conning others. Problems in making and keeping friends; aberrant behaviors such as cruelty to people or animals, stealing, etc.

* Irresponsibility/Unreliability
Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

* Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity
Promiscuity, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual acting out of all sorts.

* Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.

* Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story readily.

Comments OffTags:···

Motion for Sanctions

February 26th, 2010 · Comments Off · Dawn Estep

Sanctions Against Dawn Estep

Motion for sanctions against Defendant Estep heard on Februrary 4, 2010 – Santa Monica Superior Court. This motion was taken off-calendar by Plaintiff’s Attorney following communication from Defendant Dawn Estep’s Attorney indicating his interest in being released from the case.


Comments OffTags:

Superior Court Case Proceedings

February 13th, 2010 · No Comments · Dawn Estep

The Case:

L.A. Superior Court: Case Summary

***** ***** ***** VS. DAWN ESTEP ET. AL.

Filing Date: 03/17/2009
Case Type: Contractural Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending


Future Hearings

04/26/2010 at 09:30 am in Department WER, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding
Jury Trial (-FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE) - Trial Date Vacated

04/23/2010 at 09:30 am in Department WER, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding
Final Status Conference ((J/T 4-26-10)) - Matter heard, matter continued

02/19/2010 at 08:31 am in department WER at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401
Motion – Relieved As Counsel ((DEF))

02/04/2010 at 09:01 am in department WER at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401
Motion to Compel (RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONSIN THE SUM OF $1,840.00 AGAINST DEFENDANT DAWN ESTEP & HER ATTYSOF RECORD.)

04/12/2010 at 09:01 am in department WER at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401

Motion to Compel (RESP TO REQ FOR PRODUC OF DOCS(PLTFF))

04/23/2010 at 09:30 am in department WEX at 9355 Burton Way, Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Final Status Conference ((J/T 4-26-10))

04/26/2010 at 09:30 am in department WEX at 9355 Burton Way, Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Jury Trial

01/27/2010 Notice (OF NON-RECEIPT OF OPPOSITION TO MTN TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES;DECLA OF XXX H. XXX )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

01/07/2010 Notice (NOTICE OF CASE RELOCATION TO DEPT R ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

01/07/2010 Motion to Compel (RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES & REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE SUM OF $1,840.00 AGAINST DFNT DAWN ESTEP & HER ATTYS OF RECORD,RADCLIFF & SAIKI,JOINTLY & SEVERALLY;DECLA OF JOHN H.XXXxxx) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

12/03/2009 at 09:01 am in Department WEX, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding Motion to Set Aside Default ((DEF MURDOCH GROUP, INC.)-CASE MNGMT CONF(BOTH C/F 11-3-09)) – Motion Denied

12/03/2009 at 09:01 am in department WEX at 9355 Burton Way, Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Motion to Set Aside Default ((DEF MURDOCH GROUP, INC.)-CASE MNGMT CONF(BOTH C/F 11-3-09))

11/03/2009 at 09:01 am in department WEX at 9355 Burton Way, Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Conference-Case Management

10/13/2009 at 01:30 pm in department WEX at 9355 Burton Way, Beverly Hills, CA 90210Civil Default Prove Up Hearing ((1 HOUR))

10/13/2009 at 09:00 am in department WEX at 9355 Burton Way, Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Conference-Case Management (***CONT 11-3-09 D NTC)



Documents Filed
Proceeding Information

Parties

ESTEP DAWN – Defendant

MURDOCH GROUP INC. – Defendant

MURDOCH GROUP LIMITED – Defendant

RADCLIFF & SAIKI – Attorney for Defendant

***** ***** ***** – Plaintiff

STROUD DAWN – Deft’s AKA

xxx JOHN x. LAW OFFICES OF – Attorney for Plaintiff



Case Information
Party InformationProceeding Information

Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

03/05/2010 Notice of Motion (and motion to deem requests for admissions admitted and request for monetary sanctions in the sum of $1,840.00 against defendant Dawn Estep; declaration of John xx. xxxx in support thereof) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/05/2010 Notice of Motion (and motion to compel defendant Dawn Estep to attend her deposit- ion and to produce documents thereon without objection and for sanctions in the sum of $2,101.00; declaration of John x. xxxx….) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/05/2010 Notice of Motion (and motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories and request for monetary sanctions in the sum of $1,840.00 against defendant Dawn Estep; declaration of John x. xxxx in support…) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/05/2010 Statement – General (Plaintiff’s separate statement in support of motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories and request for sanct- ions against defendant Dawn Estep in the sum of $1,840.00)

2/19/2010 Order (GRANTING ATTORNEY’S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL (SIGNED BY JUDGE LISA HART COLE) ) Filed by Moving Party

02/16/2010 Notice of Ruling Filed by Attorney for Defendant

02/16/2010 Proof of Service Filed by Attorney for Defendant

02/11/2010 Declaration (IN SUPPORT OF ATTY’S MTN TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL. )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

02/11/2010 Ex-Parte Application (FOR AN ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR NOTICE & HRG ON RADCLIFF & SAIKI LLP’S MO. TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

02/11/2010 Notice of Motion (TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

02/03/2010 Notice of Motion (TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUC OF DOCS & PRODUC OF DOC THEREON & REQ FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE SUM OF $1,840.00 AGAINST DFNT DAWN ESTEP & HER ATTY OF RECORD,RADCLIFFE &SAIKI,JOINTLY)

Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

11/03/2009 NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE
(OF MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT RE MURDOCH GROUP & CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/20/2009 Opposition (to set aside default)
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

10/08/2009 Motion for an Order (set aside default)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/17/2009 NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE  Filed by Attorney for Defendant

07/09/2009 Answer to Complaint Filed (BY DAWN ESTEP STROUD) Filed by Attorney for Defendant

06/23/2009 Statement-Case Management  - Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

06/17/2009 Proof of Service of Summons & Com (party served: Dawn Estep) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

05/01/2009 Request for Entry of Default (request for entry of default as to murdoch group limited, llc
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

05/01/2009 Request for Entry of Default (request for entry of default as to murdoch group,inc.
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

04/30/2009 Proof of Service of Summons & Com ( PARTY SERVED: MURDOCH GROUP LIMITED, LLC )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

04/30/2009 Proof of Service of Summons & Com (PARTY SERVED: MURDOCH GROUP, INC. )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

03/17/2009 Complaint Filed



Case Information
Party InformationDocuments Filed
Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

02/19/2010 at 08:31 am in Department WER, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding
Motion – Relieved As Counsel ((DEF)) - Motion Granted

02/11/2010 at 08:30 am in Department WER, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding
Exparte proceeding - Motion Granted

02/04/2010 at 09:01 am in Department WER, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding
Motion to Compel (RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIESAND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONSIN THE SUM OF $1,840.00 AGAINSTDEFENDANT DAWN ESTEP & HER ATTYSOF RECORD.) - Off-Calendar-Request-Moving Party

07/06/2009 at 08:30 am in Department WEX, Lisa Hart Cole, Presiding

Conference-Case Management ((CMC HELD, DEFAULT PROVE UP HRGSET.)) - Other: See Memo Box below



Case Information
Party InformationDocuments FiledProceeding Information


Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


feedNuts Feed Profile

feedNuts Feed Profile

Dr.5z5 Open Feed Directory

Technology Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Blog Collector

blog directory

The SEO King

Feed Shark

RSS Search

Viesearch

GeekySpeaky: Submit Your Site!

RSS Search

Monitor link

–>

Get this blog as a slideshow!

Powered by feedmap.net

→ No CommentsTags: